Recently, I saw a bumper sticker on the back of a car in a local parking lot that read “Science Is Not A Conspiracy.” I assume this statement to mean that science and conspiracy are mutually exclusive of one another, and that “conspiracy theories” have no relation whatsoever to science.
I also take it to mean that those sporting such statements believe themselves to be intellectually sophisticated, as our system has conditioned us to believe that those who believe in science are smart, and those who believe in conspiracy are “anti-science” and not so smart. Of course, science is of great value to humanity, but it is only so if it is employed honestly and without bias. Science only has validity if those practicing it are intellectually honest, free from bias as much as possible, free from financial incentives as to the outcomes of their studies and experiments, and free from any political persuasion as to their conclusions. The problem with science in today’s world is that people are easily pressured and influenced by financial incentives and political persuasion. When elements of the power structure can hold up their “science,” it is used as justification to influence the masses into going along with whatever direction it wants to orient people’s thinking and thus move society. Science is performed by people, and as such only has value to the extent that people have the capacity and will to practice it with integrity. To believe that the institution of science is not tainted by corrupt influence can at best be called naive. What the vast majority of people really mean when they say they believe in science is that they believe what government, the media, and Pharma and its representatives tell them is science. They trust, and have a psychological need to believe that the power structure is operating in the spirit of truth and transparency. One study to examine here comes from the CDC in 2004.
The study is entitled “Age at First Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination in Children with Autism and School Matched Control Subjects: A Population Study in Metropolitan Atlanta,” and was published in the American Academy of Pediatrics in February, 2004. One of the scientists involved in this study was senior scientist Dr. William Thompson, Ph.D. In August, 2014, Thompson contacted Brian Hooker, Ph.D., and informed him that he and four other scientists involved in this study had committed fraud by deliberately withholding very significant findings. The real findings from 2001, when the study was taking place, were supplied to Hooker and revealed that younger age exposure to the Measles-Mumps-Rubella(MMR) vaccine increased the risk of autism. Specifically, there was a 340% increased risk of autism developing in boys receiving the MMR vaccine according to the CDC schedule as opposed to receiving it later. There was also shown to be a significantly higher risk of developing autism for black boys aged 18-36 months receiving this vaccine compared to white boys. This data was all left out of the published product in 2004, according to Thompson, as they were ordered to suppress these findings. Thompson stated: “The higher ups wanted to do certain things and I went along with it.” What the so-called higher ups wanted to do was to mold and caress their findings into supporting the narrative that there is no connection between vaccines and autism. Despite the fact that a participant in this study admitted to having committed fraud along with the other scientists, the study has not been retracted and stands as “science.”
What did these scientists do, and what did their superiors order them to do according to Thompson? They conspired to defraud the public in order to further a false narrative and reinforce Pharma’s flagship product, vaccination. This is the definition of conspiracy: people acting together, secretly, to commit fraud or a criminal act. People are rewarded for practicing science that reinforces Pharma products and are punished for publishing studies that show vaccination or drugs to be dangerous. There is tremendous pressure not to practice science that contradicts the myth that vaccines are safe and effective, and doctors and scientists know this very well.
This example is hardly an isolated incident, as two editors from two of the world’s most prominent medical journals have attested to. Former Editor in Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Marcia Angell, stated the following: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor at the New England Journal of Medicine.” As well, in April of 2015, Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, wrote: “Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid explanatory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends…science has taken a turn towards darkness.” Those involved in this fraudulent science know what they are doing and conspire with others to do so for their own reward. Jim Meehan, MD, of Tulsa, Oklahoma has stated that the pharmaceutical industry is the most powerful entity in the history of the world, and as such, is able to steer science in the direction it desires.
John F. Kennedy stated before the Press Corp on April 4th, 1961, the following: “…For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence-on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. its dissenters are silenced, not praised…” The worldwide conspiracy that he spoke of has subverted the institutions he mentioned, including that of science, and he spoke of this over 60 years ago. The institution of science has long been compromised. JFK was not an “anti-science, conspiracy theorist,” but rather, was someone in a position to know how the world really works and was not afraid to say it. The world system he spoke of is described and prophesied in the book of Daniel, chapter 7:
“This is what he said, The fourth beast is the fourth kingdom on earth, which is different from all other kingdoms, and it devours all the earth, tramples it down and crushes it.” (Daniel 7:23)